Friday, January 1, 2010

Sri Lanka's displaced Tamils - A market-based solution

AP

SQUATTING under an umbrella bearing an EU logo, a woman in a faded sari dips into her blue UNICEF bag and pulls out two towels, some toothbrushes and toothpaste, sanitary napkins and a small bottle of disinfectant. She is soon ringed by hagglers wanting her paltry wares for even less than the pittance she asks. Another woman clambers from a bus lugging a sack of flour donated by the World Food Programme. She jostles for space among the throngs of internally displaced Tamils peddling their rations near the hospital in Vavuniya in the north of Sri Lanka. Just months ago, many of them were treated here for injuries sustained as the Sri Lankan army defeated Tamil Tiger rebels.

After the rout of the Tigers in May, nearly 300,000 Tamils who fled the fighting were fenced inside sprawling camps near Vavuniya. After concerted foreign pressure the government opened the camps on December 1st. It was also swayed by the need for Tamil votes in the hotly contested presidential election to be held on January 26th.

Almost at once dozens of displaced civilians started taking their staple dry rations to town. They sell lentils, wheat-flour, parboiled rice, curry powders, chickpeas and toiletries. There are mosquito nets and cloth nappies, tea, slippers and even a vegetable grater. Traders are arriving from other parts of the country. Prices are at wholesale levels or below, and one says she had heard she could get things cheap for her grocery shop. Some of the poorer camp inmates make money from occasional odd jobs and manual labour. But there is too little work to go around. So selling the rations seems the natural thing to do—not, one adds earnestly, that they are given too much. Rather, it is the only way to earn money to pay for other needs.

Vavuniya may soon lose its pavement hawkers, however. President Mahinda Rajapaksa has promised to resettle all displaced civilians in their home villages by January 31st. His main electoral challenger is his former army commander, Sarath Fonseka. They will split the vote of the Sinhalese majority. So both need to court minorities, notably the Tamils.

U.L.M. Haldeen, of the Ministry of Resettlement, says hundreds of families have already been taken back to their villages and given tin roofing sheets, a cash grant and cooking utensils to help them rebuild their lives. He says only 101,113 of the 300,000 remain in camps, and denies allegations that the displaced are being quietly moved into other temporary housing, as the government flounders around in search of a coherent resettlement plan.

Many of the displaced show no interest in the election. One says he will vote, but only because it means he can visit his village. Another stares back blankly when asked if she knows the candidates. No idea, she says, distracted by a uniformed policeman who wants to buy a mosquito net. His small change matters more than the would-be presidents’ promises.






Readers' comments

Sandyvadi wrote:
It is indeed a market-based solution.

NEARLY $537 million in tsunami aid for Sri Lanka is unaccounted for and over $686 million has been spent on projects unrelated to the disaster, an anti-corruption watchdog Transparency International (Sri Lankan) says.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/breaking-news/sri-lanka-tsunami-aid...

Reports from the World Bank, which recently concluded an audit of its $150-million tsunami rebuilding work, found out that a multitude of government agencies slowed down recovery programs leaving room for misuse of funds.

Sri Lanka was forced to refund the bank in cases where funds were misused. The bank said the government had bought 168 motorcycles for other work and claimed them from tsunami aid budgets.

Geroge Bush wrote:
This is nothing when you compare what we did in Iraq. We killed million people, including half a million children in our oil robbery. Whole world is silent. We can go on doing this forever. Most of the EU countries are supporting us because they are as bankrupt as US. We have no assets. Only liabilities to China and Japan. So we will rob everybody.

jin_jinn wrote:
As Doc Forsythe says the picture of the Tamil boy is a heart breaking one. But everything else is crap.

There is no Tamil or Sinhala land in Sri Lanka. Now more than 50% in Colombo are non Sinhalese, infact 52% of the Tamil population that is over a million live in southern parts of the country, mainly Colombo and you still call it is Sinhala Colombo?

More than 30% of the Sri Lankan parliment is again non Sinhalese and you call it the Sinhalese government too.

Face the facts, what happened to the Tamils in the North is quite unfortunate, but that was a direct result of the brutal war carried out by the LTTE, which was fuelled and funded by the diaspora who are here again spreading the hatred. Did I see any constructive comment here other than pure hate?

Saheem wrote:
Leaders in Sri Lanka do not care about the country but the power and their families. The way Tamils were starved in the war zone, chased out of their homes, bombardment using illegal weapons and holding them behind barbed wires without allowing reporters, carers, relatives or even their elected MPs tolisten to them show the brutality and inhumanity of the president. Sareth Fonseka will not be any exception to the post-independent rulers who have filled their purse, employed their friends and relatives and used the Sinhala-Buddhist armed forces to inflict the maximum pain on the oppressed minorities especially Tamils. The international community will as usual be contented with lip service on human rights and war crimes, nothing more.

jin_jinn wrote:
The article says that the govenment released the refugees due to international pressure.

But didn't the govenment promise to do so to the UN just as the war ended, and didn't it try to keep its promise by doing so?

What the international community, which was kind of blind folded by the propaganda of the Tamil diaspora wanted was an immediate release of all Tamils just after the war. But the hidden thing behind that push by the diaspora is to get the LTTE cadres who were mingled within the innocent Tamils released.

A country that suffered over 30 years of terrorism obviously didn't want that to happen; they needed time to figure out the LTTE carders who were tought only to kill and rehabilitate them into the normal society. It is an utter lie to say that no international organization was given access to the camps, infact there were 52 organizations operating thoughout.

SanMarino wrote:
The wretchedness you describe is not confined to the IDPs but is typical of all poor people in Sri Lanka. Tamil Tiger nostalgists in these posts try to use your description to wallop Sri Lanka but readers need to be aware of the above. All the 'punishments' being prescribed for Sri Lanka, by Tiger activists and bankrupt politicians in the West such as David Miliband, for daring to crush the Tiger terrorists, will surely increase the wretchedness quotient of these poor people. Withdrawing the GSP+ dispensation will only hit the poor in Sri Lanka. What myopic idiots these Western politicians are! They target the leadership and relatives of al-Qaeda and the Taliban (rightly so) without a qualm yet are waving the 'human rights' flag on Sri Lanka, accusing her of all types of cooked-up violations. Israel blew up a leader of Hamas in his wheelchair, yet no breastbeating was noted from Western politicians! Give me a break, guys! Hypocrisy! Hypocrisy! Hypocrisy!

jin_jinn wrote:
Saheem, just a minor clarification... did you say that the government forced the Tamils out of their homes? But according to the fled Tamils it was the LTTE who forced them to retreat with them and held them hostage at the gunpoint.

SanMarino wrote:
The elimination of a few 'leaders' of the Tamil Tigers, allegedly carrying white flags of surrender, by squaddies in the field is being squeezed to the maximum by Tiger nostalgists and their deluded Western supporters. But how were the soldiers in the field to know that these surrendees were legit? The may have been strapped with bombs, a technique well practised by the Tigers. The first thing you do is eliminate the perceived danger and ask questions later. Cops do this in London and Los Angeles and Blackwater's thugs routinely eliminate perceived 'terrorists' in Iraq even if they are only poor motorists going the wrong way. So why this cooked up rage over Sri Lanka's elimination of terrorists???

SanMarino wrote:
Russell_B faults Sri Lanka for not 'solving' the refugee problem seven months on. Hey, Russ, this is a poor country that was fighting terrorists for the last three decades. Give Sri Lanka a break! The Yanks have still not resettled the people of New Orleans. The unbridled hostility of the West upon the elimination of the Tigers was one reason Sri Lanka stayed away from an SWAT Valley-type aid effort. Moreover, there was the memory of aid after the tsunami --- lots of photo-ops for Western politicians but little aid that followed. It was mostly Sri Lankans who helped Sri Lankans after the tsunami. (Oh, yes, fat cat INGO execs came in cavorted in the tropical paradise and religion-based aid efforts tried to convert Buddhist and Hindus). Yes, and Sri Lanka will successfully resettle the IDPs once their villages are cleared of mines and infrastructure is set up. Why don't you watch Ian Wright's 'Out of Bounds' program on Sri Lanka? A bit of an antidote to the TamilNet rubbish you are swallowing!

jin_jinn wrote:
This is what all Sri Lankans want and wish, live in harmony
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=10617964

The IC and the diaspora who left the country thanks to the Civil war in SL and didn't want that to end, please mind your own business.

Prem_Mahen wrote:
Until the people stop voting for a canditate who speaks nothing but racism, sri Lanka will not be a peaceful country.

PassTheSugarPlease wrote:
Cannot tell you enough how a resurgent economy will benefit the Tamils of the North and East, and help them overcome the trauma of conflict.

For posters like Sandyvadi and Russel_B, take a cue from the woman selling the mosquito net. People like her couldn't give a dime about petty politics and your kind of perpetual victim culture. Let her and people like her get on with their lives without the obstructions of the Tamil diaspora.

Prem_Mahen wrote:
Where will these 300,000 civilians go?. Destroyed their houses and giving them tin roofed shelters!. If these were sinhalese, what will be the reaction?.
Please be humane, just let these innocent go. Let them find their own way

schweigen wrote:
Let's get one thing out of the way first: there are no Tamil lands in Sri Lanka. There is Sri Lankan land for ALL SRI LANKANS, irrespective of race or religion. People who advocate race based land systems are just that: racists.

jin_jinn, agree with you totally about the phrase "Sinhalese government". This is used mainly by ignorant journalists with half-baked knowledge of the situation in Sri Lanka, and happily latched onto by opportunistic Eelamists (or is the other way around??)

SanMarino, great perspectives!

Senthan wrote:
Tamil civilians continue to face the brunt even after the end of civil war. It's clear as to why Tamils were released from these camps, they want Tamils votes. Political agenda is the main concern of Sri Lankan governments, not how to resettle Tamils back to a normal life. Tamils don't know who to vote for, a man who order to eradicate Tamil civilians or the man who facilitated all the military strategies to win the war. Who ever does come in power, Tamils grievances will never be met because the leadership would be in the hands of Sinhalese. I hope there will be changes in the near future where the Tamils will be resettled and can enjoy a peaceful lifestyle.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Tweet